<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>A Year With The Puma 92 | Water And Woods</title>
		<link>http://waterandwoods.net/2008/11/a-year-with-the-puma-92/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterandwoods.net/?p=1117#comment-944</guid>
		<description>My stainless version came with a slightly figured hardwood stock. Very nice for the price.  If you want a knock-out looking stock you can try to find a .454 Browning  Lever Action.  Good luck! It will cost as much as four Pumas and who wants to bring a collectors item in the woods? When you consider weight, power, functionality and price there is nothing to compare the M92 to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stainless version came with a slightly figured hardwood stock. Very nice for the price.  If you want a knock-out looking stock you can try to find a .454 Browning  Lever Action.  Good luck! It will cost as much as four Pumas and who wants to bring a collectors item in the woods? When you consider weight, power, functionality and price there is nothing to compare the M92 to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
